Its always a very easy route to blame a natural predator, because then we don’t have to make changes to our lives. Many natural wild predators do not have predators themselves, but the fact of the matter is that what keeps them in check is numbers of its prey items. If a predator out eats its food source, it will then either starve or just breed less and then its food source should recover.
Don’t forget that sparrowhawks and song thrushes have been continually existing alongside each other far longer than we have been around and should we disappear they would continue to do so
Thank you getting in touch and writing this. In a lot of ways I do agree with you. Yet I still think that the RSPB are too much ‘on the side of’ birds of prey. Not necessarily sparrowhawks, but birds of prey in general.
I agree with you about the lack of food and nest sites. That is why I am putting together a bird friendly plant list.
I have a category about cats – cats kill birds. I don’t understand how cat owners can let this happen.
Yes sparrowhawks and thrushes may have existed alongside each other before we were around, BUT the thrushes would not have had to put up with domestic cats, lack of food and nest sites that are making reducing their numbers today.
Thanks once again. As I said at the beginning getting different views and getting comments like this is one reason I keep birdtablenews going. Cheers. Trisha